Executive Times |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume
7, Issue 11 |
November 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ã
2005 Hopkins and Company, LLC Note
re: links---certain hyperlinks assume that you are registered as a subscriber
to the site. If you are not a subscriber to certain sites, the links will
fail. If you register, the links should work. Also, certain hyperlinks expire
and may not be available when you try to go to the site. Obligations
Executives rely on others to get the
work of the organization done. The larger the organization and the more
locations in which it operates, the more important the job of the executive
is in articulating the values, culture and methods the organization will use
or will avoid in carrying out its mission. The more complicated the business,
the greater the reliance on experts to assist in understanding risks and in
making effective decisions. Under pressure to reduce costs, many
organizations have outsourced or subcontracted work activities to other
entities. In this issue, we explore some recent stories of ways in which
executives have been challenged by the activities of the expert advisors, the
subcontractors and the outsourcers. As you reflect on how other executives
are dealing with their situations, think about how you can learn from them in
improving your executive performance. Fifteen new
books are rated in this issue, beginning on page 5. Five books are recommended
with three stars; nine are mildly recommended with two-star ratings, and one
book (reviewed highly elsewhere) eked out a single star rating. Our next
issue will recap our best and worst books of 2005. Visit our 2005 bookshelf
at http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/2005books.html
and see the rating table explained as well as explore links to all books
we’re reading or considering this year. If there’s something missing from the
bookshelf that you think we should be considering, or if there’s a book
lingering on the Shelf of Possibility that you think we should read and
review, let us know by sending a message to books@hopkinsandcompany.com.
While most
executives clearly consider their obligations to employees among the critical
factors to consider in carrying out corporate strategies, executives at
struggling companies are looking for creative ways to recast the relationship
between employer and employee. We read in The
Wall Street Journal (10/26) (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB113029189328179595.html)
that Northwest Airlines, in
addition to its well-publicized fights with the mechanics’ union, has
petitioned the bankruptcy court to outsource pilot, flight attendant and
ground worker jobs. According to the Journal,
“It's another sign that Northwest, which filed for bankruptcy-court
protection last month, wants to become a ‘virtual airline,’ with all sorts of
jobs previously claimed by organized labor outsourced to cheaper workers,
some overseas.” It’s almost impossible to avoid flying on an airline that’s
not in bankruptcy, but we’re at a loss in anticipating what a virtual airline
will be like, especially one committed to finding the lowest cost workers for
every job. If “virtual” is the opposite of “real,” this strategy may turn out
to be unreal. We’ve been amused on flights when an attendant or pilot forgets
what the destination city is. We can anticipate announcements that end with,
“Thank you for flying … what airline is this?” How critical is the relationship
between your organization and its employees? Have you drawn distinctions
between those roles that can be outsourced and those that are critical to be
performed by workers who feel that they are in a relationship with your
organization? Can you anticipate the reaction of your customers to the use of
the lowest cost workers for different roles?
There may be
no harder activity in the world today than finding civilian workers to come
to Are you vulnerable to the behavior of subcontractors,
brokers and other intermediaries? How clearly have you communicated the laws,
rules, values, ethics and behaviors that these intermediaries must follow on
your behalf? How are you sure that your expectations are being met? When your
reputation is damaged by others, will the cost of repair be more or less than
the cost you saved by using lower cost intermediaries? Diligence Some
executives are adept at pushing relentlessly until they get their questions
answered. Others are satisfied when they receive the counsel of experts, especially when it comes to detailed due
diligence. While the fiasco and probable fraud at Refco
continues to unfold daily, it appears that some savvy and smart people
overlooked some clever accounting, and at least one hero sniffed on the right
trail and discovered trouble. According to The New York Times (10/14) (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/24/business/24fund.html),
“Peter F. James had been working at Refco
less than two months when he noticed something this summer that teams of
accountants had apparently missed for years. Mr. James, a recently hired
employee in the controller's office, wondered why a larger-than-normal
interest payment had been made to Refco on an
outstanding loan made by the company. In August he started to ask questions,
eventually taking his concerns to the chief financial officer, Gerald M. Sherer. The answers would lead to the departure of
the chief executive and the rapid unraveling of the company that prompted its
filing for bankruptcy protection last week. ‘He's the hero in discovering
this,’ a person close to the investigation said of Mr. James. ‘He just kept
pushing.’” James accomplished more than the $10 million worth of diligence Thomas
H. Lee Partners paid for when they acquired a majority stake in Refco in 2004. How
relentless are you in getting your questions answered? How do you go about
checking the work of the due diligence and other experts you rely on for
answering critical questions? How do you bring a fresh perspective that might
lead to insights that are overlooking currently? Consequences Injected into a flattering profile of Merrill Lynch Vice Chairman Bobby
McCann in The New York
Times
(10/23) (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/23/business/yourmoney/23merrill.html)
is a great example of executive leadership in communicating with employees.
According to the Times, “In July, when an
arbitration panel ruled that Merrill Lynch had to reinstate E. Hydie Sumner,
a former employee who had successfully sued the firm for sexual
discrimination, Mr. McCann drafted a letter to employees, which he rewrote
many times. ‘While we have some questions regarding the legal foundations of
the panel's ruling and are weighing our options, I want to be very clear: we
have only ourselves to blame for this situation,’ he wrote in the final
draft. ‘Ms. Sumner was subjected to conduct that was unacceptable and
offensive. That is inexcusable. Management's response at the time failed to
effectively punish those responsible.’ The language in the letter was far
stronger than had been used by the firm, but he stands behind it. ‘If you are
going to damage the reputation of this company, you must be held
accountable,’ Mr. McCann said about the events. The obligation to ensure a
safe workplace and to enforce codes of conduct seems alive under McCann at
Merrill. How well
have you communicated the behaviors that are inexcusable at your
organization? How do you hold individuals accountable for behavior? Trust We read in Fortune (http://www.fortune.com/fortune/articles/0,15114,1119285,00.html)
that BP’s CEO John Browne started to rebrand the
company as a friend of the earth in 1997 by pledging to reduce carbon-dioxide
emissions. “Ads drew attention away from its core oil and gas operations. One
read, ‘We believe in alternative energy, like solar power and cappuccino.’
BP's new slogan: Beyond Petroleum. The ads continue to feature a strongly
green theme, and BP's image makeover is a hit, regularly featured in B-school
case studies and corporate conferences. … The value in BP's rebranding, says Peter
Sealy, a professor at the How well
are you fulfilling your executive responsibilities to build trust and to
create favorable impressions of your organization? Does your image and that
of your organization put the wind at your back? Is the image backed up by
action? What else can you do to build trust? Follow-up
Here are
selected updates on stories covered in prior issues of Executive
Times: Ø
We
pondered in the January 2003
issue of Executive Times whether or not
the Archdiocese of Boston’s former leader Cardinal Bernard Law
would be indicted or incarcerated for his egregious behavior in condoning or
covering up priests molesting and abusing children. That hasn’t happened, and
comprehensive reports about similar executive cover-up behavior appears in
the personnel files released for Los Angeles (www.la-clergycases.com), a
comprehensive report about Philadelphia (http://ncronline.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2005d/100705/100705a.php),
and news reports about Ireland (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0510260170oct26,1,3887270.story).
Sooner or later, one of the bishops who enabled the perpetrators, persecuted
the victims, and condoned or covered up crimes will end up in jail. Ø
We
speculated in the February 2005
issue of Executive Times, about
whether John Henry and his
performance management measurements for the Boston Red Sox would mean the beginning of a dynasty following
their 86 year gap between World Series wins. No streak began, as hometown
team Chicago White Sox won their
first World Series in 88 years. Readers who appreciate fine writing will
enjoy an article by Julia Keller in
the Chicago Tribune about the glory
of this win (http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/whitesox/chi-0510270173oct27,1,2537517.story).
Ø
Many
prior issues of Executive Times have commented
on the woes at Ford Motor Company. Two recent articles provided
opposite views on whether or not CEO William Clay Ford, Jr. is a reluctant
CEO or not. While The New York Times reports (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/19/business/19ford.html)
that Ford is no longer reluctant to perform this role for the family, Fortune
opines (http://www.fortune.com/fortune/ceo/articles/0,15114,1112528,00.html)
that based on his overtures to executives at other car companies, there may
be a new leader coming soon. Legacy
Decisive An effective
executive often creates a legacy at an organization as a result of setting a
strategy that survives his or her tenure. Sometimes a strategy is right for
the time, and is later reversed by those who follow because what worked
yesterday may not work tomorrow. Edward
R. Telling made more strategic changes as chairman and CEO of Sears, Roebuck and Company in forty
days in 1981 than any of his predecessors or successors. Telling decided to
leverage the contact Sears had with consumers and offer financial services
products alongside retail goods, creating the expectation that people would
buy their stocks where they bought their socks. Telling expected that the
customers of Sears had rising incomes that would be a perfect fit to an array
of financial services. The change also reduced the company’s dependence on
retailing. The sweeping moves of acquiring Coldwell Banker and Dean
Witter changed Sears overnight. Telling led Sears from 1978 until he
retired in 1985. His successors decided to divest these acquisitions and
focus more intently on retailing. Meanwhile, Wal-Mart may be working to put a Wal-Mart bank in each of its
stores. Thanks to Telling’s vision and
decisiveness, consumers have more financial services alternatives than ever
before, and the financial services components of many companies are
consistent drivers of earnings growth. In late October, Telling died at age
86. Latest Books Read and Reviewed: (Note: readers of the web version of Executive Times
can click on the book covers to order copies directly from amazon.com. When you order through these links, Hopkins
& Company receives a small payment from amazon.com. Click on the title to read the review or
visit our 2005 bookshelf at http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/2005books.html).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ã
2005 Hopkins and Company, LLC. Executive
Times is published monthly by Hopkins and Company, LLC at the
company’s office at To subscribe to Executive
Times, sign up at www.hopkinsandcompany.com/subscribe.html
and we’ll bill you later. Consider
giving clients or friends Executive Times
as a gift. Gift subscriptions to the web version include an e-mail
notification of the gift. Print
version gift subscriptions can also include “Compliments of (giver)” with
your corporate logo on each copy. About
Hopkins & Company Ø Coaching:
helping individuals or teams find ways to do more of what works for them, and
ways to avoid what's ineffective Ø Consulting:
helping executives solve business problems, especially in the areas of
strategy, service to market, performance and relationship management Ø Communications:
helping executives improve their written and oral messages To engage the services of Hopkins &
Company, call Steve Hopkins at 708-466-4650 or visit www.hopkinsandcompany.com. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|