Executive Times |
|
Volume 3,
Issue 1 |
January 2001 |
|
|
ã 2001 Hopkins and Company, LLC Note re: links---certain
hyperlinks assume that you are registered as a subscriber to the site. If you
are not a subscriber to certain sites, the links will fail. If you register,
the links should work. Also, certain hyperlinks expire and may not be
available when you try to go to the site. A First Time for EverythingA turn of the calendar
page changing from one year to another can provide executives with a
convenient opportunity to do something different, both personally and for
their organizations. Most companies have already completed operational plans
and start the new year with a clear sense of purpose and direction. Over the
past few months, certain executives and their companies have taken actions
that had never been taken before. Have you been one of those executives? Have
you had the courage to move in a new direction? Have you made a personal
commitment to your own growth for 2001? Is it time for you to examine some
overlooked parts of your organization where there may be some hidden
liability? As you read the following stories about other executives, think
about what you’re prepared to do this year. What will you do differently in
2001? How will your leadership evolve? What skills and talents will your
organization need this year, and will you and those who report to you possess
the skills and talents needed? Out with the Olds General Motors CEO Rick Wagoner knew that he needed to
make a critical decision about the brands supported by GM. Rumors abounded
for years that the Oldsmobile division had no future, so it came as only a
modest surprise in mid-December when GM announced
the end of Oldsmobile. “We stretched to find profitable ways to further
strengthen the Oldsmobile product line, including developing products with
our global alliance partners, but in the current environment, there was no
workable solution,” said Wagoner. In the past, GM counted on Oldsmobile for
many innovations in automotive engineering, manufacturing and distribution.
If you’re interested in finding out the number of “firsts” from Oldsmobile,
visit http://207.37.252.232/olds/newstuff/didyouknow.htm.
Despite a hundred year history and heritage, Wagoner and team couldn’t
convince car buyers that Olds was anything other than our grandparents’ car. What’s been
around your organization for too long, not pulling its own weight? Will you
be the executive with the courage to say, “Enough is enough?” After trying
hard to make something work, when do you cut your losses? What baggage do you
need to let go of during 2001? The Buck Stops Here The
stories about executive compensation don’t usually hit the business press until
proxy statements catch the attention of reporters. When top executives at Charles Schwab and Company announced a
new plan to cut expenses, the Associated Press wire
spread the word quickly. Instead of layoffs or changes in non-salary
expenses, Schwab decided to cut executive pay from 5 to 50% during the first
quarter of 2001. The three top Schwab execs will see a salary cut of 50% from
January into April. Other senior executives will face 10-20% cuts in January
and February, and junior managers will see a 5% cut. The company is also
encouraging workers to volunteer for unpaid leaves of up to twenty days as a
way of helping cut expenses until conditions rebound. What
messages do employees and investors receive from your organization about
executive compensation? Have you considered creative ways of ensuring that
your compensation remains appropriate in changing environments? In what ways
does your executive compensation lead by example? Would you have done what
Schwab did as a way of implementing expense cuts in your organization? Who’s the Best? The Fortune issue (1/8/01) covering the “100 Best
Companies to Work For” came out recently. It can be interesting to examine
what a team of magazine writers and editors define as “best” and get ideas on
approaches and practices that can be used elsewhere. While this particular
list has been created only four or five times, we always like some of the
quotes from executives at these “best” companies. Jack Walters, vice president of HR
at Alcon
Labs, says, "We don’t need people who work like robots anymore. We
need people who watch robots." Can you picture a tired robot watcher
heading home after a long day? No must-see TV for them; they’ve been watching
robots too long already. Look for those robot watcher ads in your local
paper. "Everybody at every level gets something that is meaningful to
them," says Marcia Hyde, vice president of human resources at Valassis
about compensation. Somehow we think that those workers who get incentive pay
representing 10% of a $30,000 salary would also find an amount considerably
higher to be meaningful to them. The
current 100 list includes a retrospective on the changes that have taken
place over time that have separated good companies from the best ones. Some
executive or organization had to be first to do something that elevated that
company in the eyes of employees by offering benefits or perks including paid
vacation, water coolers, onsite day care, dry cleaning pickup or pet
insurance. While we’re usually skeptical of the criteria for these “best”
listings, any executive or organization can decide to take action that will
represent significant improvements. The importance of any particular change
is relative to what it means for an individual executive or for their
organization. What will you do in
2001 to move ahead in becoming whatever it is that would make you “the best”?
What two or three changes can your organization make to elevate its image in the
perception of employees? What does “being the best” mean for you personally?
How do you currently measure up to that standard? Poised for Action The
competition for executive talent requires the best organizations to be
prepared to fill top jobs quickly when talent is available, and to possess
patience and a willingness to wait until certain individuals are available to
be hired. Following General Electric’s selection of Jeff Immelt
to succeed Jack Welch as CEO, two GE executives were perceived to be available
to become CEO elsewhere. 3M acted quickly to appoint W. James
McInerney, former head of GE Aircraft Engines as its new CEO. Home
Depot followed a day later and named Robert Nardelli, former head
of GE Power Systems as its CEO. In Home Depot’s case, it was in no hurry to
appoint a new CEO, with 58-year-old co-founder Arthur Blank comfortably in
place. While they were quietly looking for a number two executive to share
leadership with Blank, the availability of skilled GE executives caught their
attention, and the company acted quickly to bring Nardelli on board. Blank
was willing to step aside when it became clear that Nardelli would join the
company only in a CEO role. Do you
search for talent when no jobs are open? Are you willing to wait until the
person you want most is available? Would you be as willing as Arthur Blank to
step aside earlier than planned in order to bring top talent into your
organization? Pirates Walk the Plank
Nail Your Boss We read with alarm in The
Wall Street Journal (12/13/00)
that a group called the Business Software Alliance (BSA) tracks down
organizations using unlicensed software and takes enforcement action. What
was alarming was one of their campaigns called, “Nail Your Boss” which
encouraged disgruntled employees to report abuses of software. The bill for
pirated computer software came due in the amount of $108,000 for an Atlanta
law firm that was turned in by the former employee who installed the
software! BSA also has a program called “Truce” which gives a company an
amnesty period in which it can bring its licenses current. Executives may
want to spend some extra time ensuring that all software on corporate
machines is legal and licensed properly. How organized are your software records? How disciplined are the personal computer users in your organization about ensuring that all software is legal and licensed? It’s been a long time now since the Y2K lockdowns that ensured all software and hardware was compliant. Can you rest easy that you’re not likely to be a victim of a BSA raid on your organization? Who moves the bar?Raise carefully If we had a nickel for
every time we’ve heard the phrase “raise the bar”, we could pay a score of
people to raise the bar for us. It turns out that raising the bar might not
be as appropriate a business practice as it seems. We read in The New York
Times (12/6/00)
that Southern Company, parent of Georgia Power, is being sued
by certain former and current black workers claiming the company moved the
goal post too many times for them to be promoted. After preparing for the
requirements of a job, workers were passed over because of new requirements
for the job. One worker in underground power lines claims that he was denied
a promotion and told he needed more experience working on overhead lines.
While he disagreed, he worked on overhead lines for a year, re-applied, and was
denied this time for not having enough experience on underground lines. While
lots of companies have good business reasons for “raising the bar”, there can
be hidden liabilities, especially when a pattern of promotion may exclude
certain workers. How do you
communicate and document the changing requirements for jobs in your
organization? What hopes and expectations do you raise in employees who are
not selected for particular jobs? Will your words to them come back to you in
ways that will generate significant financial exposure for your organization?
All promotional decisions discriminate among individuals as a subjective
judgment is made about the “best fit” for a particular job. How risky are
those decisions for you and your organization? How do you ensure that
wrongful discrimination is eliminated or reduced from your decision
processes? Just Say NoLock-ins and hostages In one of the strangest
business stories we’ve ever read, we were amused to learn from The
Nando Times (12/13/00) that
2,000 employees of Korea’s Kookmin Bank stormed the company’s
headquarters and kept Chairman Kim Sang-hoon hostage in his office for
two days as a protest against expected layoffs following an expected merger.
Two weeks later, we read
that 2,000 police surrounded 15,000 workers who barricaded themselves at the
bank headquarters protesting the merger. What motivates
your employees to action? What would you do if employees held you or your
manager hostage over executive decisions they disagreed with? When your
decisions aren’t aligned with the expectations of your employees, how do you
behave? What do you communicate? Follow UpHere are selected updates
on stories covered in prior issues of Executive Times: Ø The November 2000
issue of Executive Times
mentioned Michael Armstrong’s recent restructuring of AT&T.
Since that issue, Armstrong took a step that none of his predecessors ever
did: he cut the dividend. With the stock price down by about 60% in 2000, we
can expect more scrambling by company executives during 2001. Ø The lead story in the February 2000
issue of Executive Times was
called “Waging Talent Wars.” The January 2001 issue
of Fast Company reports on a McKinsey survey that provided seven
lessons for winning the war for talent: 1. Instill a talent mindset at all levels of
the organization -- beginning with senior management 2. Create "extreme" employee
value propositions that deliver on your people's dreams 3. Build a high-performance culture that
combines a strong performance ethic with an open and trusting environment 4. Recruit great talent continuously 5. Develop people to their full potential 6. Make room for talent to grow 7. Focus on retaining high performers. LegaciesSuperman Jack Liebowitz died in mid-December at
age 100. You may not recognize his name, but chances are his vision and
business expertise has caught your attention at some time during your life.
Jack started Detective Comics in the late 1930s and changed the comic book
business dramatically. The company became DC Comics, and Liebowitz started
Action Comics and brought Superman and Batman to American culture in print
and other media. Through acquisitions, Warner Brothers eventually acquired
Liebowitz’s companies, and Jack served as a director of that company and Time
Warner for years. The New York Times reported
that he came to the office every day when he was over 90 years old.
"Some people viewed comics as just a passing fad," Mr. Liebowitz
said in an interview in 1985. "Not me. From the beginning, I felt that
comics could be a vital part of the publishing field. They had a broad appeal
and a great potential for telling stories." It was that vision that led
Liebowitz to make and grow a business where others paid no attention, and
brought him to work every day, long after his contemporaries retired. Reading (Note: readers of the web version of Executive Times can click on
the book covers or titles to order copies directly from amazon.com. When you order through these links,
Hopkins & Company receives a small payment from amazon.com. Subscribers to the print version of Executive Times
can receive the web version at no additional cost. Send e-mail to hopkinsandcompany@att.net with a
request to be placed on the web version distribution list. Also, not all books we read make it to the
pages of Executive
Times. Check out http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/bookshelf.html
for other book selections. For expanded reviews of Executive Times selections and other books,
visit our book review site at http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/books/list.htm.
Note the new star rating system for 2001.) Narrow Span There are two new books about Fed Chairman Alan
Greenspan that, when taken together, represent about half a biography.
Neither book covers Greenspan expansively, and neither seemed to receive his
active involvement. The more interesting book of the two is Bob Woodward’s
Maestro:
Greenspan’s Fed and the American Boom. Woodward uses his journalistic skills to make the reader feel you’re
standing side by side with Greenspan and a wide cast of characters. Justin
Martin’s Greenspan:
The Man Behind Money doesn’t approach Woodward’s depth on economics
and reveals less about what goes on behind the scenes at the Fed. He does
something Woodward doesn’t: he tells us about Greenspan the man, and about
many of his formative relationships, including that with his mother and the
influence of Ayn Rand and the Objectivists. You can sample chapter one of Maestro
at http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/w/woodward-maestro.html
and chapter one of Greenspan
at http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/m/martin-greenspan.html.
If you want to learn more about the Fed and how it works, give Maestro a try.
If you want to learn a thing or two about Alan Greenspan the person, read the
Martin book. For a longer review of Maestro,
visit: http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/books/Maestro.htm.
For a longer review of Greenspan,
visit: http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/books/Greenspan.htm.
Recommendation: •• for Martin; ••• for Woodward. Masterful There’s no shortage of things to love about Margaret
Atwood’s award winning novel, The Blind
Assassin. Atwood’s dialogue consistently remains in the style of the
1930s and 1940s, and she captures the flavor of elements of that period flawlessly.
The book’s structure involves a book within a book, and the ease with which
Atwood makes transitions from one to the other shows off her considerable
skill. The characters and plot lead us through a time and into places that
Atwood develops with care and precision. Here’s a sample: “Richard joined us as if on cue, and the two men
shook hands. My own hand was taken, squeezed briefly. Then my elbow. That was
how men steered women around in those days - by the elbow - and so I was
steered by the elbow into the Imperial Room. Richard said he’d wanted the
Venetian Café, which was lighter and more festive in atmosphere, but
unfortunately it had been fully booked. Our curiosity remained
piqued throughout this book, wondering just where Atwood was taking all this.
By the end, she pulled all the treads together, and when we closed the book,
we knew at once that we already missed the joy of reading this book. You can
sample chapter one of this book at: http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/a/atwood-blind.html.
Recommendation: •••• Lysine Liar Kurt Eichenwald delivers a fascinating business thriller in his new book, The
Informant: A True Story. You may recall the many stories in the
business press during the 1990s concerning Marc Whitacre, an Archer
Daniels Midland executive turned FBI mole. After taping price fixing
conversations among ADM executives and their counterparts at competitor
lysine producing companies, Whitacre continued his sideline business:
stealing funds from ADM through phony invoices and other forms of fraud.
You’ll shake your head on many pages wondering why ADM’s controls were so
weak. You’ll be amazed at Whitacre’s lack of character, and his multiple lies
to everyone who talked to him. You may be concerned that you might be unable
to identify a criminal like Whitacre within your own organization. You can
sample chapter one of this book at: http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/e/eichenwald-informant.html.
For a longer review, visit http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/books/The
Informant.htm. Recommendation: •••• Playing with Fire When it comes to action and suspense, readers have relied on the skills of Robert Ludlum for many years. Ludlum delivers another outstanding suspense novel with his latest book, The Prometheus Deception. Espionage itself can be delightful to read, especially with ongoing shifts in alliances. Add cryptology to that mix, along with conspiracy, and a heavy dose of information technology, and Ludlum provides a recipe for reading pleasure. If you have any concerns at all about privacy, power brokers and the use of technology, you’ll enjoy how this book puts those themes in a context that is believable and frightening. For a longer review, visit http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/books/The Prometheus Deception.htm. Recommendation: ••• |
|
|
|
ã 2001
Hopkins and Company, LLC. Executive
Times is published monthly by Hopkins and Company, LLC at the
company’s office at 723 North Kenilworth Avenue, Oak Park, Illinois 60302.
Subscription rate for first class mail delivery of the print version is
$60.00 per year (12 issues). E-mail subscriptions are $30.00 per year. Single
issues: $10.00 print; $5.00 electronic. To subscribe, sign up at www.hopkinsandcompany.com/subscribe.html,
send an e-mail to hopkinsandcompany@att.net,
call (708) 466-4650, or fax to (708) 386-8687. For permission to photocopy or
e-mail Executive Times, call (708) 466-4650 or e-mail to hopkinsandcompany@att.net. We will send
sample copies if requested. The company’s website at http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/archives.html
contains the archives of back issues beginning in the month after the issue
date. To subscribe to Executive Times,
sign up at www.hopkinsandcompany.com/subscribe.html
and we’ll bill you later. Consider
giving clients or friends Executive Times
as a gift. Gift subscriptions to the web version include an e-mail notification
of the gift. Print version gift
subscriptions can also include “Compliments of (giver)” with your corporate
logo on each copy. About Hopkins
& Company
To engage the services of Hopkins & Company,
call Steve Hopkins at 708-466-4650 or visit www.hopkinsandcompany.com. |
|
|