|
Executive Times |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
2005 Book Reviews |
||
Unveiling
by Suzanne M. Wolfe |
|||
|
Rating: ••• (Recommended) |
||
|
|
||
|
Click on
title or picture to buy from amazon.com |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Restoration Suzanne M.
Wolfe’s debut novel, Unveiling,
cleverly uses the motif of art conservation to reveal the personal redemption
and transformation that we can need in our own lives. Protagonist Dr. Rachel Piers
bears the scars of personal tragedy as she conducts her art restoration with
skill. Both are unveiled during the course of the novel through well-timed
exposition and descriptive language. Here’s
an excerpt, all of Chapter VI, pp. 42-47: The next day, on the way
to the museum, Rachel pondered not so much the results of Donati’s
tests which were what she had expected after her cursory examination of the
triptych the day before, but his discovery several weeks ago that Persegati and the Eliot-Simpson Museum in Manhattan had
ordered a private examination of the triptych not more than a month before
Rachel was given the assignment. The results indicated the triptych was very
possibly a lost work by Rogier Van der Weyden. Rachel heard the
name like a suckerpunch to the gut. Rogier was one of the two most celebrated Northern
Renaissance painters, the other being Jan van Eyck,
and the discovery of a lost masterpiece by him was a career-making,
once-in-a-lifetime event. Suspicion instantly replaced elation. Why had this
been kept from her? As soon as Donati left she picked up the phone and dialed Up until two, pacing back
and forth, going over and over the significance of Donati’s
news, trying to tie in Apex’s connection. The report indicated that
the painting had originated in Northern Europe and that the mix of pigments
was similar to those favored in Rogier’s She was shown in by Persegati’s assistant who told her that he had just
arrived and was in his office. “But he asked not to
disturbed,” she called after her as Rachel headed for the library. “Slept well?” she said to
Venus as she passed underneath the painting. She walked down the corridor
leading off the library and, after a cursory knock, went straight in. He was sitting at his
desk, a paper knife hovering over a pile of letters in front of him. If he
was irritated at her abrupt appearance he didn’t show it. He laid down the
knife and stood up. “Dr. Piers, you are early.
What a pleasant surprise!” He gestured to a chair. “Coffee?” “Please.” Anything to
clear her head. The events of the night before as well as the wine on an
empty stomach, had left her with a powerful
emotional hangover. Punching an intercom, Persegati spoke into it, then
laid his hands on the arms of his chair, a medieval king about to give
judgment, the gleam of a heavy gold signet ring on the little finger of his
right hand completing the effect. “You have something to say
before the meeting?” “Yes. Two things actually.
One concerns the fact that you ordered an initial examination of the
triptych, the results of which were kept from me and my team. And second,
exactly what has Apex to do with this project? Satisfy me on these two points
and there’s a chance I won’t be on the next plane back to The assistant entered
carrying a tray. The cups and saucers of fine china smattered about the rim
with tiny blue flowers—forget-me-nots or cornflowers—rattled delicately as
she set the tray down on the desk. Very English, very feminine, and totally
at odds with the almost overbearing sparseness of the room. But not, Rachel
was coming to realize, with Persegati’s tastes. The assistant poured the
coffee in a thin, dark stream, bruising the flowers to violet through the
wafer transparency of the china. When the cups were full she handed one to Persegati and then one to Rachel. The assistant’s
movements were efficient to the point of abrupt and some of the coffee
slopped into the saucer and splashed onto Rachel’s skirt. “Thank you, Anna. She nodded and turned to
leave. “And Anna? I am expecting
an important call from the monsignor at the “Very good, Dr. Persegati.” He studied his coffee cup
for some moments. Its arrival had given him time to compose himself. “I am, as you know, the
director of the Roman State Institute for Conservation. In such capacity, I
really have two jobs. One . . .“ he lifted a carefully manicured finger,
“I am responsible for the conservation of this city’s artifacts. But, as you
are doubtless aware, that cannot be done without money.” He came round the
front of the desk and topped up Rachel’s cup then leaned against the edge of
the desk with his arms folded and chin down as if
inspecting the tips of his shoes. The weak January sunlight glossed his oiled
hair and picked out a burgundy thread in the weave of his suit. “Which
brings me to the second point. I am a fund-raiser, Dr. Piers. A
business man, if you will. As you are no doubt aware, without capital we
cannot preserve our national treasures. It is my practice to conduct a
preliminary analysis before going ahead with conservation. Depending on the
results I then go to a certain individual or corporation and ask for
sponsorship. In this case, I approached the Apex Corporation, which, as you
may know, owns factories in Rachel shook her head.
“No, I didn’t know. So when you thought the triptych could be a lost work of Rogier Van der Weyden you knew you could go after a big sponsor like Fujifilm and the Sistine Chapel,” she said. Persegati sighed. “That is not the way I would
have put it, Dr. Piers, but essentially, that is correct. Big business. . . . How can I say this delicately?” His
hands fluttered in the air. “Big business prefers big names.” “In return for what, might
I ask?” He walked around his desk
as if he wanted to put himself out of range of her questions. “Media rights?” She was
fishing pretty wildly but she knew she must have snagged at something when
she saw a look of irritation pass over his face. “Dr. Piers, please do not
think I have completely sold my soul to the devil. That is not the Italian
way. We prefer something altogether more . . . indirect, let us say.” “I understand.” Fujifilm had agreed to sponsor the restoration of
Michelangelo’s fading masterpiece in return for exclusive film rights to the
process. It had netted them enormous international prestige. “In addition to paying for
the restoration process, the Apex Corporation will buy the exclusive rights
to sponsor an international exhibition in That would be quite a
coup, Rachel had to admit. And clever of him. The museum would get the media
coverage without seeming to directly solicit it. Donati
had been right and wrong at the same time. Apex would profit from the
triptych but it was nothing so crude as money. Their
name would be splashed all over the exhibition, and her own
museum would share in the glory. Obviously that was the key to her own involvement. Without hesitation she
said, “My position here is compromised.” “I don’t follow.” “Authenticating the
triptych as a Rogier is clearly in my own
interests, and that of my museum.” “Actually, the Apex
Corporation specifically requested your involvement. They are extremely optimistic
about your ability to authenticate it correctly. As I am, I assure you.” “Nevertheless.” Rachel
placed her cup and saucer on the desk and stood up. “We did not want to
prejudice your work by telling you beforehand,” he said in a more
conciliatory tone. “That hasn’t been a
problem before. Besides, the work’s either by Rogier
or it isn’t. Either way, the job’s the same.” “Quite so, Dr. Piers. I
admire your, how you say, rectitude.” Rachel didn’t see that
morality had anything to do with it. What concerned her was her professional
integrity. She marveled at Persegati’s obtuseness,
feigned or real she couldn’t tell. “What will happen to the
triptych afterwards?” Rachel asked. “Providing, of course, it turns out to be
a Rogier. And if it isn’t a Rogier?” Just then the phone rang. “Ah, Monsignor. Just a
moment, if you please.” Persegati put his hand over
the mouthpiece. “I beg you to give some thought to what I have said. We would
be desolated to lose your expertise on what may prove to be an historic
project.” Many female
readers will empathize with Rachel Piers, both in the struggles she faces in
her work life, especially with some men, and in the impact of scars from her
personal life. Unveiling
is well written and while the reading time will pass quickly, reflection
about life and redemption will last for a long while. Steve Hopkins,
December 20, 2004 |
||
|
|
||
Go to Executive Times
Archives |
|||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
ã 2005 Hopkins and Company, LLC The recommendation rating for
this book appeared in the January 2005
issue of Executive Times URL for this review: http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/Books/Unveiling.htm For Reprint Permission,
Contact: Hopkins & Company, LLC • E-mail: books@hopkinsandcompany.com |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||