|
Executive Times |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
2005 Book Reviews |
||
Thomas
Paine and the Promise of America by Harvey J. Kaye |
|||
|
Rating: ••• (Recommended) |
||
|
|
||
|
Click on
title or picture to buy from amazon.com |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Aspirations Harvey Kaye examines
the life and times of a Revolutionary War patriot whose legacy has often been
portrayed through the lens of those who have selected a single point of view,
or whose words have been quoted by those with whom Paine would vehemently
disagree. In Thomas
Paine and the Promise of America, Kaye provides a more complete view of
Paine, and in so doing, raises more opportunity for exploring the impact of
Paine on American life and in considering the extent to which we’ve lived up
to his expectations and aspirations for us. Here’s an excerpt, from the end of
Chapter 2, “An American Revolutionary,” pp. 60-63: A brilliant propagandist,
Paine discussed battlefield setbacks in terms of the fresh opportunities they
afforded. On one occasion, his doing so may have saved Over and over again Paine
roused Americans to renew the struggle: “Those who expect to reap the
blessings of freedom, must like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it.”
He reminded them of the righteousness of their cause and praised them for
their world-historic accomplishments. If only “the mist of antiquity be
cleared away, and men and things be viewed as they really were,” he proudly
wrote, Americans’ ranking above the supposedly superior Europeans ancient
and contemporary would be plain, for “had it not been for America, there had
been no such thing as freedom left throughout the whole universe.” Americans,
he affirmed, had every reason to hope and to fight. “I look through the present
trouble to a time of tranquility,” Paine predicted, “when we shall have it in
our power to set an example to the world.”56 The theme of American identity,
nationalism, and solidarity pervaded Paine’s wartime writings. He
persistently worried about the country’s fragile unity, and a major dispute
over the future of the western territories gave substance to his fears. The
Articles of Confederation adopted by Congress in 1777 clearly favored states
like Virginia that held expansionary claims to western lands, instigating
Maryland, one of the “locked-in” states, to resist ratification. Unwilling to
sit by and watch the country splinter, Paine applied himself to preparing and
releasing a special pamphlet, Public Good, in which he proposed that
the territories be treated as national property, and he presciently
discussed the possibility of their eventual admission as new states. Haunted
by the possibility of the confederation breaking up, he again pushed for a
“Continental convention” to create a Paine worried not only
about recruiting soldiers but also about equipping them, for fiscal woes
persistently plagued the government, seriously jeopardizing the war effort.
In 1780, when the tide once again seemed to turn against the Americans, he
called upon the rich to advance the necessary funds. And though hardly rich
himself, to set a good example he personally donated $500. But the real
problem was that the Articles of Confederation made Congress financially
dependent on the states, and any changes to the
document required approval by all of them. When Congress requested a
change in 1781 that would have permitted it to impose an import duty, Paine
dedicated one of the Crisis papers to urging its acceptance. And soon
afterward, appreciating how Paine’s writings had helped to maintain troop
morale and rally support for the army (and recognizing that Paine needed an
income), Washington arranged a secret commission for him to continue to
cultivate sympathy for Congress’s need to raise revenue. While most states
agreed to the new duty, The war demanded
solidarity, and postrevolutionary prospects required
unity, but Paine did not expect, imagine, or desire uniformity. He applauded In the summer of 1776 the In late 1778, after the British
withdrew from Here as well, Paine set out a series of
powerful propositions on freedom, equality, and democracy. Registering that
“the toleration act in England, which granted liberty of conscience. . . was
looked upon as the perfection of religious liberty,” he proudly maintained
that “America is the only country in the world that has learned how to treat
religion,” for “in America we consider the assumption of such power as a
species of tyrannic arrogance, and do not grant liberty
of conscience as a favor but confirm it as a right.” At
the same time, he never lost sight of the dangers of class. Admonishing his
fellow citizens—the well off, in particular—not to forget that “in all
countries where the freedom of the poor has been taken away, in whole or in
part, that freedom of the rich lost its defence,”
he insisted that “freedom must have all or none, and she must have them
equally.”61 Paine was not naïve. He
knew freedom could be dangerous, but he pointed out that “if dangerous in the
hands of the poor from ignorance, it is at least equally dangerous in the
hands of the rich from influence.” Dismissing neither possibility, he
suggested ways of addressing them. To prevent ignorance he recommended
education. And to prevent political corruption he again demanded democracy:
“numerous electors, composed as they naturally will be, of men of all
conditions, from rich to poor.”62 On October 19, 1781, the
Americans and their French allies defeated the British at Nevertheless, Paine
remained anxious: “It would be a circumstance ever to be lamented and never
to be forgotten, were a single blot, from any cause whatever, suffered to
fall on a revolution, which to the end of time must be an honor to the age
that accomplished it.” Perhaps he was thinking of slavery. Definitely he had
in mind the troubled status of the American confederation. “I ever feel
myself hurt when I hear the union, that great palladium of our liberty and
safety, the least irreverently spoken of. It is the most sacred thing in the
constitution of Devoting the final Crisis
to promoting the “ 55. Crisis II, pp. 1:68, 71; Crisis V, pp. 1:105—29. 56. Crisis IV, pp. l:102;
Crisis V, p. 1:123; Crisis III,p. 1:83. 57. Paine, Public Good (1780), in CW, pp. 2:303—33. 58. Crisis X; Paine, “Six Letters to 59. Paine, “A Serious Address to the People of 60. Ibid., pp. 2:277—302. 61. Ibid., pp. 2:284—85. 62. Ibid., pp. 2:284—89. Paine at this time would
have excluded from the franchise only those men “in voluntary [and temporary]
servitude,” specifically, those holding “offices or employments in or under
the state . . . to which there are profits annexed” and
“servants in families, because their interest is in their master” (p. 2:287). 63. Paine, Crisis XIII, in CW, p.
1:230. 64. Ibid.,
pp. 1:232, 234. 65. Ibid., pp. 1:233—34, 231. Paine’s legacy
of articulating a radical vision of freedom and equality continues to provide
inspiration today. For many readers of Paine, the implications can be
overwhelming, and the democracy he favored has often been diluted in favor of
representative government by an elite class. In many ways what was radical in
the 18th century remains radical today, and reading Thomas
Paine and the Promise of America reminds us all that the promise remains
attainable. Those who have quoted Paine, but fundamentally disagree with his
politics may cease their quoting after reading this book. Steve Hopkins,
September 25, 2005 |
||
|
|
||
Go to Executive Times
Archives |
|||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
ã 2005 Hopkins and Company, LLC The recommendation rating for
this book appeared in the October 2005
issue of Executive Times URL for this review: http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/Books/Thomas
Paine.htm For Reprint Permission,
Contact: Hopkins & Company, LLC • E-mail: books@hopkinsandcompany.com |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||