|
Executive Times |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
2007 Book Reviews |
|||
There
Goes the Neighborhood: Racial, Ethnic, and Class Tensions in Four Chicago
Neighborhoods and Their Meaning for America by William Julius Wilson and Richard
P. Taub |
||||
Rating: |
*** |
|||
|
(Recommended) |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Click on
title or picture to buy from amazon.com |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Coalitions Two sociologists
and their students studied four different neighborhoods in Written with the
collaboration of Reuben A. Buford May and Mary Pattillo African
Americans migrated from the South to Real
estate speculators helped fuel this rapid racial displacement. Capitalizing
on strong demand for housing by both blacks and
whites, these deceitful speculators staged episodes of violence to convince
white residents that African Americans were bringing crime and drugs into
Groveland. In October 1959 three white Fifty-year-old
Al Charles, who grew up in the post— World War II Black Belt, recalled how
venturing into Groveland was then a perilous enterprise,2 as
white children would beat up black youngsters who crossed Chicago’s symbolic
Mason-Dixon line. “I always had to have some friends go with me, and we had
better be prepared to fight.” Charles
and his adventuresome friends formed the vanguard that presaged the
expansion of the Black Belt. Infrequent youthful trips into white
neighborhoods preceded waves of migration by entire families to South Side
neighborhoods, and later into select suburbs that eventually became black
enclaves. Akeem Davis, an African American in his
forties who moved into the neighborhood when he was a teenager, remarked:
“When I first moved here, the neighborhood was going through racial changes.
I remember you would walk out of the house and get jumped on. There were
other ethnic groups and sometimes we couldn’t walk down the street without
getting pop bottles thrown at us.” Despite these incidents, Groveland proved
relatively immune to the violence endemic to other Groveland
did not succumb to widespread violence for several reasons. First, since it
was situated nearly six miles from the original Black Belt, Groveland did not
receive a large in-migration of African Americans until halfway through the
1960s. Second, the relatively high social and economic standing of longtime
white homeowners and incoming African Americans alike smoothed the process
of racial change. In fact, new black residents actually held a slight economic
and educational edge over the neighborhood’s previous occupants. Residents’
median years of schooling rose from 12.1 to 12.4 years from 1960 to 1970, for
example, while their poverty rate fell from 6.1 to 5.1 percent. Incoming
African Americans also had much in common with white residents, as
Groveland’s brick-faced, suburban-style, single-family homes appealed to
families who preferred to buy rather than rent. Thus landlords could not
exploit the fast-paced housing market by subdividing apartments for blacks
with lower incomes. Because of these influences, the proportion of homeowners
in Groveland has remained above 70 percent since 1950, and many residents
have lived in the neighborhood for decades.4 African
American residents often arrived in Groveland from neighborhoods where
congested buildings in disarray and streets soiled with litter lowered
property values and fostered crime. These new residents exhibited a vigorous
desire to maintain their new dwellings. A visit to Groveland revealed the
fruits of this desire for cleanliness and neighborhood upkeep, as signs
reading WELCOME and billboards urging HAVE A NICE DAY! framed
finely landscaped houses.5 Residents actively encouraged car
owners to drive slowly and mind children who might be playing in the
neighborhood. This community spirit manifested itself in other ways as well.
According to Melissa Rains, a staff member for the alderman representing
Groveland, residents who lived near a group of abandoned houses “all come
together and mow the lawn and pick up the trash so that you really can’t tell
that the houses are abandoned.” Block
clubs—the neighborhood’s most visible form of social organization—played a
critical role in ensuring that newcomers observed traditions established by
older members of the community and provided a venue for neighbors to deal
collectively with their problems. Block-club signs such as DRIVE CAREFULLY,
NO LOUD MUSIC, NO LITTERING, and NO HORN BLOWING adorned the entrances to
many areas, reflecting the middle-class status of residents who remained
vigilant lest low-income patterns of behavior emerge. Alderman Trisha Hill
reported that block clubs effectively addressed two central issues in
Groveland, graffiti and sanitation, as the clubs invited representatives from
city departments to meet with their members. Block clubs also advanced
proposals for combating crime, paving streets, putting up Christmas lighting,
and removing sidewalk snow. Overall, the block clubs “are very effective in
rendering city services,” according to Hill. Longtime
residents had built strong families and lasting friendships around their
shared concern for the neighborhood’s future. Linda Marshall, a
thirty-eight-year-old married mother of two, lived with her husband, whom
she met in high school, within a block of both their parents. Three of
Linda’s five sisters resided nearby with their children, and another sister
had recently moved to a neighborhood in the immediate vicinity. Linda
reflected on the neighborhood’s close relationships: You’d never know it,
but it’s like one big family around here. Like if you just came up here [to
the Groveland field house], you’d never know all the people that’s related, like Diedra and
Bird and Lance are brothers and sisters. And like Spider went to Plummeting demand for
low-skilled workers stemming from deindustrialization left many black
neighborhoods in Government jobs instilled a
sense of control and power among residents that was apparent in casual
conversations and at community meetings. Residents often relied on their
strong links to government officials to try to rectify problems, typically
showing much persistence. At one meeting on public safety, Sara Wilson, a
woman in her mid-thirties, complained about a neighbor who was fixing cars
and using hazardous materials in the alley near her home. According to Sara,
despite two complaints to the city government and a call to 911, no police
car had driven past to examine the situation. Even when her husband, a There
Goes the Neighborhood presents both data and personal stories in ways
that make the conclusions supportable. This is recommended reading for anyone
struggling to build stronger communities. Steve Hopkins,
January 25, 2007 |
|||
|
|
|||
Go to Executive Times
Archives |
||||
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
2007 Hopkins and Company, LLC The recommendation rating for
this book appeared in the February
2007 issue of Executive Times URL for this review: http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/Books/There
Goes the Neighborhood.htm For Reprint Permission,
Contact: Hopkins & Company, LLC • E-mail: books@hopkinsandcompany.com |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||