| 
   
  | 
  
   Executive Times  | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   2006 Book Reviews  | 
 |||
| 
   Field Notes
  From a Catastrophe by Elizabeth Kolbert  | 
 ||||
| 
   Rating:  | 
  
   ****  | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   (Highly Recommended)  | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   Click on
  title or picture to buy from amazon.com  | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   Hot In her new book, Field
  Notes From a Catastrophe, Elizabeth Kolbert
  lays out the facts about global warming in a systematic way that will alert
  every reader to what’s happening with climate change. Expanded from a three-part
  series she did for The New Yorker, Kolbert presents the topic of global warming clearly and will
  for many readers be the first reading on this subject that leads to
  understanding and possible action. Here’s an excerpt, from the end of Chapter
  3, pp. 62-66: In October 2000, in a
  middle school in Barrow,  The day after I went to
  talk to Sigurdsson, I attended the symposium’s
  plenary session. In addition to nearly three hundred scientists, it drew a
  sizable contingent of native Arctic residents—reindeer herders, subsistence
  hunters, and representatives of groups like the Inuvialuit Game Council. In
  among the shirts and ties, I spotted two men dressed in the brightly colored
  tunics of the Sami and several others wearing
  sealskin vests. As the session went on, the subject kept changing—from
  hydrology and biodiversity to fisheries and on to forests. The message,
  however, stayed the same. Almost wherever you looked, conditions in the  Global warming is routinely
  described as a matter of scientific debate—a theory whose validity has yet to
  be demonstrated. The symposium’s opening session lasted for more than nine
  hours. During that time, many speakers stressed the uncertainties that
  remain about global warming and its effects—on the thermohaline
  circulation, on the distribution of vegetation, on the survival of
  cold-loving species, on the frequency of forest fires. But this sort of
  questioning, which is so basic to scientific discourse, never extended to
  the relationship between carbon dioxide and rising temperatures. The study’s
  executive summary stated, unequivocally, that human beings had become the
  “dominant factor” influencing the climate. During an afternoon coffee break,
  I caught up with Corell. “Let’s say that there’s three hundred people in this room,” he told me. “I
  don’t think you’ll find five who would say that global warming is just a
  natural process.” (While I was at the conference, I spoke to more than twenty
  scientists, and I couldn’t find one who described it that way.) The third part of the
  Arctic-climate study, which was still unfinished at the time of the
  symposium, was the so-called policy document. This was supposed to outline
  practical steps to be taken in response to the scientific findings,
  including—presumably—reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The policy document
  remained unfinished because American negotiators had rejected much of the
  language proposed by the seven other Arctic nations. (A few weeks later, the  That evening, at the hotel
  bar, I talked to an Inuit hunter named John Keogak,
  who lives on Banks Island, in  “We just thought, Oh, gee,
  it’s warming up a little bit,” he recalled. “It was good at the start—warmer
  winters, you know—but now everything is going so fast. The things that we saw
  coming in the early nineties, they’ve just multiplied. “Of the people involved in
  global warming, I think we’re on top of the list of who would be most
  affected,” Keogak went on. “Our way of life, our
  traditions, maybe our families. Our children may not have a future. I mean,
  all young people, put it that way. It’s just not happening in the  The symposium in  By the time I got to the
  lookout over Sólheimajökull, it was raining. In the
  gloomy light, the glacier appeared less sublime than merely forlorn. Much of
  it was gray— covered in a film of dark grit. In its retreat, it had left
  behind ridged piles of silt. These were jet-black and barren—not even the
  tough local grasses had had a chance to take root on them. I looked around
  for the enormous boulder I had seen in the photos in Sigurdsson’s
  office. It was such a long way from the edge of the glacier that for a moment
  I wondered if perhaps it had been carried along by the current. A raw wind
  came up, and I started to head down. Then I thought about what Sigurdsson had told me. If I returned in another decade,
  the glacier would probably no longer even be visible from the ridge where I
  was standing. So I climbed back up to take a second look. It’s early to
  tell whether Field
  Notes From a Catastrophe will become the Silent Spring of this generation. All readers will benefit from
  reading this sober book, and learning many of the facts about what has been
  contributing to climate change, and what will happen if changes aren’t made.  Steve Hopkins,
  May 25, 2006  | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   | 
 |||
| 
   Go to Executive Times
  Archives  | 
 ||||
| 
   | 
 ||||
| 
   | 
  
   | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   
 The recommendation rating for
  this book appeared  in the June 2006
  issue of Executive Times URL for this review: http://www.hopkinsandcompany.com/Books/Field
  Notes From a Catastrophe.htm For Reprint Permission,
  Contact: Hopkins & Company, LLC •  E-mail: books@hopkinsandcompany.com  | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   | 
 |||
| 
   | 
  
   | 
 |||